Showing posts with label Hunter S. Thompson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hunter S. Thompson. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 September 2026

Joan Didion — What if the person the writer is selling out is herself?

What happens when a writer turns the camera on herself? Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking asks whether we can trust our own memories.
Joan Didion, The Year of Magical Thinking and what happens when the writer turns the camera on herself

We've been here before. In fact, Joan Didion is where much of this journey began.

In Slouching Towards Bethlehem, she gave us the sentence that has followed us through almost every writer we've encountered since: “Writers are always selling somebody out.”

Thursday, 10 September 2026

What if you trusted a writer with your story?

The Journalist and the Murderer by Janet Malcolm and Fatal Vision by Joe McGinniss, exploring trust and betrayal in nonfiction
Janet Malcolm, The Journalist and the Murderer and the betrayal at the heart of nonfiction

Imagine spending months talking to a writer. You tell them things you wouldn't normally tell people. They meet your family. They read your letters. They listen sympathetically while you explain the worst thing that has ever happened to you. Eventually, perhaps inevitably, you begin to think this person understands you.

Then the book comes out, and you discover that the writer you thought understood you has turned you into a character you barely recognise.

That is the nightmare sitting at the centre of Janet Malcolm's The Journalist and the Murderer. And after everything we've been reading about writers, truth and the people who become material, I suspect Malcolm is the writer we've been heading towards all along.

Friday, 4 September 2026

Can you tell the truth by making things up?

Can journalism be inaccurate and still tell the truth? Hunter S. Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas tests the limits of fact, fiction and Gonzo journalism.

Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and the strange truth of Gonzo journalism

Here's a question. Can you tell the truth by making things up? Norman Mailer walked into the story and announced himself. Joan Didion sat quietly at the edge of it and watched.

Hunter S. Thompson drove into Las Vegas with a boot full of drugs. At which point the idea of journalistic objectivity was probably in some difficulty.

Friday, 28 August 2026

Joan Didion and Norman Mailer: The literary odd couple

Joan Didion and Norman Mailer seemed like literary opposites. But their New Journalism revealed a shared problem: can a journalist ever truly be objective?
Joan Didion and Norman Mailer do not immediately strike you as two writers who should have had much in common.

Mailer was loud, combative, theatrical and seemingly incapable of entering a room without eventually becoming one of the principal subjects under discussion. He ran for mayor of New York. He got into fights. He appeared on television and argued with people. He wrote about politics, war, sex, boxing and himself, frequently managing to combine several of these subjects at once. Norman Mailer didn't simply have a public persona. At times, Norman Mailer appeared to be the principal character in the ongoing Norman Mailer production. He was always the main character.

Didion was something else entirely. Small, watchful, controlled. Dark glasses, cigarette, notebook. She cultivated the impression of somebody sitting quietly at the edge of the room while everyone else made the potentially catastrophic mistake of forgetting she was there.

Thursday, 6 March 2025

A guide to reading Joan Didion

Joan Didion on May 1, 1977. Her 1993 New Yorker essay “Trouble in Lakewood” still resonates.
I’m a big fan of Joan Didion. I’ve read most of her published works, with her novel Play It As It Lays, Slouching Towards Bethlehem, and The Year of Magical Thinking among my favourites. What I’ve always appreciated about her writing is the precision and emotional depth she brings to her words. Few others come close. She possessed an unmatched ability to distil complex emotions and cultural shifts into sentences that feel both effortless and weighty.

Joan Didion's writing is a masterclass in precision and insight. Her distinctive style, marked by pared-down, rigorous prose, captured the nuances of American life and personal introspection. As a leading figure in the New Journalism movement of the 1960s, Didion's work blended literary flair with journalistic integrity, offering readers a profound lens through which to view the world.